ANALISIS YURIDIS SENGKETA MEREK JASA KULINER TEMPO GELATO (Studi Putusan Nomor 473 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021)

Kevin Bunjamin, 1922011024 (2022) ANALISIS YURIDIS SENGKETA MEREK JASA KULINER TEMPO GELATO (Studi Putusan Nomor 473 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021). Masters thesis, UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG.

[img]
Preview
 File PDF
Abstrak.pdf
Download (207Kb) | Preview
[img] File PDF
TESIS Kevin (FULL).pdf
Restricted to Hanya staf
Download (2229Kb) | Minta salinan
[img]
Preview
 File PDF
TESIS Kevin FULL (tanpa pembahasan).pdf
Download (2080Kb) | Preview

Abstrak (Berisi Bastraknya saja, Judul dan Nama Tidak Boleh di Masukan)

Penelitian ini membahas tentang sengketa merek yang masih sering terjadi di masyarakat yaitu pada merek jasa kuliner Tempo Gelato. Permasalahan dalam tesis ini adalah Apa pertimbangan hukum hakim pada sengketa Tempo Gelato dalam putusan Nomor 473 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021, apa pertimbangan hukum hakim telah sesuai dengan prinsip First to File di Indonesia dan apa akibat hukum pada putusan Nomor 473 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021 terhadap pendaftaran merek tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif. Data sekunder di peroleh dari penelitian kepustakaan yang meliputi buku-buku literatur, peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen-dokumen resmi dan internet. Analisis data dilakukan dalam bentuk kualitatif yang diolah ke dalam bentuk kalimat (deskriptif). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa: Pertimbangan hukum hakim pada sengketa merek “Tempo Gelato” pada Putusan Nomor: 473 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021 menggunakan teori keadilan dan teori kebenaran untuk menjadi landasan karena pertimbangan hakim dapat menunjukkan reputasi hakim. Pertimbangan hukum hakim telah sesuai dengan prinsip First to File di Indonesia dengan dasar hukum Pasal 68 Ayat (1-3) UU MIG yang berbunyi, “Gugatan pembatalan pendaftaran Merek dapat diajukan oleh pihak yang berkepentingan berdasarkan alasan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 4, Pasal 5, atau Pasal 6 dengan Permohonan kepada Direktorat Jenderal dan diajukan kepada Pengadilan Niaga. Akibat hukum dalam Putusan Nomor 473 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021 terhadap pendaftaran merek “Tempo Gelato” adalah bahwa merek dagang Il Tempo De Gelato harus dicabut. Saran, kepada Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual untuk lebih selektif dalam melakukan penerimaan permohonan pendaftaran merek agar tidak terjadi sengketa merek seperti Tempo Gelato dan Il Tempo De Gelato. Agar pelaksanaan dalam perlindungan hukum terhadap merek dagang di Indonesia dapat berjalan maka diperlukan kerjasama dengan memanfaatkan perangkat peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai merek serta ketentuan-ketentuan internasional yang menyangkut mengenai perlindungan terhadap merek terkenal. Kata Kunci : Sengketa, Merek, Jasa Kuliner. The study discusses the dispute that still often occur in society, namely the Tempo Gelato culinary service brand. The problem in this thesis is what are the judges' legal considerations in the Tempo Gelato dispute in the decision Number 473 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021, what are the judges' legal considerations in accordance with the First to File in Indonesia and what are the legal consequences of the decision Number 473 K/ Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021 on the registration of those mark. This research uses a normative approach. Secondary data is obtained from library research which includes literature books, laws and regulations, official documents and internet. Data analysis was carried out in qualitative form which was processed into sentences (descriptive). Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that: The judge's legal considerations in the "Tempo Gelato" brand dispute in Decision Number: 473 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021 use the theory of justice and the theory of truth to be the basis because the judge's considerations can show the reputation of the judge . The judge's legal considerations are in accordance with the First to File in Indonesia with the legal basis of Article 68 Paragraph (1-3) of the MIG Law which reads, "A lawsuit for cancellation of a Mark registration may be filed by an interested party based on the reasons as referred to in Article 4, Article 5, or Article 6 with an application to the Directorate General and submitted to the Commercial Court. The legal consequence in Decision Number 473 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021 on the registration of the “Tempo Gelato” mark is that the Il Tempo De Gelato trademark must be revoked. Suggestions, it is hoped that the Directorate General of Intellectual Property will be more selective in accepting applications for trademark registration so that there will be no trademark disputes such as Tempo Gelato and Il Tempo de Gelato. In order for the implementation of legal protection for trademarks in Indonesia to run, cooperation is needed by utilizing the laws and regulations concerning trademarks and international provisions concerning the protection of well-known marks. Keywords: Dispute, Brand, Culinary Services.

Jenis Karya Akhir: Tesis (Masters)
Subyek: 300 Ilmu sosial > 340 Ilmu hukum > 346 Hukum privat, hukum perdata
Program Studi: Fakultas Hukum > Magister Hukum S2
Pengguna Deposit: 2301890640 . Digilib
Date Deposited: 19 Jan 2023 06:40
Terakhir diubah: 19 Jan 2023 06:40
URI: http://digilib.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/68386

Actions (login required)

Lihat Karya Akhir Lihat Karya Akhir
Digital Library is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.