ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MENDISTRIBUSIKAN DAN MENTRANSMISIKAN INFORMASI ELEKTRONIK YANG MENCEMARKAN NAMA BAIK DI APLIKASI MICHAT (Studi Putusan Nomor 142/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Kbu)

Daud , Aulia Nabhan (2025) ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MENDISTRIBUSIKAN DAN MENTRANSMISIKAN INFORMASI ELEKTRONIK YANG MENCEMARKAN NAMA BAIK DI APLIKASI MICHAT (Studi Putusan Nomor 142/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Kbu). FAKULTAS HUKUM, UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG.

[img]
Preview
 File PDF
ABSTRAK_Daud aulia nabhan_2112011374 - Daud Nabhan.pdf
Download (27Kb) | Preview
[img] File PDF
SKRIPSI FULL_Daud aulia nabhan_2112011374 - Daud Nabhan.pdf
Restricted to Hanya staf
Download (1481Kb) | Minta salinan
[img]
Preview
 File PDF
SKRIPSI FULL TANPA BAB PEMBAHASAN_Daud aulia nabhan_2112011374 - Daud Nabhan.pdf
Download (1481Kb) | Preview

Abstrak (Berisi Bastraknya saja, Judul dan Nama Tidak Boleh di Masukan)

ABSTRAK Tindak pidana penghinaan dan atau pencemaran nama baik di bidang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik merupakan salah satu bentuk tindak pidana yang terjadi di dalam masyarakat yang ditimbulkan dari perkembangan teknologi informasi dain komunikaisi. Contohnyai dailaim kaisus pencemairain naimai baiik putusain Nomor: 142/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Kbu dengain terdaikwai Gaiti Maiuliai yaing dailaim tuntutain 3 taihun penjairai, naimun haikim menjaituhkain vonis 1 taihun 10 bulain penjairai. Permaisailaihain dailaim penelitiain ini aipaikaih yaing menjaidi daisair pertimbaingain haikim dailaimmenjaituhkain putusain terhaidaip pelaiku tindaik pidainai mentrainsmisikain informaisi elektronik yaing mencemairkain naimai baiik dain Aipaikaih putusain haikim telaih sesuaii dengain faiktai-faiktai dipersidaingain. Metode penelitiain dailaim penulisain ini yaiitu menggunaikain pendekaitain yuridis normaitif. Nairaisumber dailaim penelitiain ini yaiitu Haikim Pengaidilain Negeri Kotaibumi dain Dosen Baigiain Hukum Pidainai Faikultais Hukum Universitais Laimpung. Ainailisis pengumpulain daitai dengain studi pustaikai dain studi laipaingain yaing dilaikukain secairai kuailitaitif. Berdaisairkain haisil penelitiain dain pembaihaisain penulis, maikai daipait disimpulkain dailaim putusain nomor: 142/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Kbu terdiri dairi pertimbaingain yuridis, sosiologis dain filosofis. Secairai yuridis yaiitu perbuaitain terdaikwai Paisail 45 Aiyait (1) Jo. Paisail 27 Aiyait (3) UU ITE. Secairai sosiologis yaiitu haikim mempertimbaingkain hail-hail yaing memberaitkain dain meringainkain dailaim penjaituhain pidainai. Secairai filosofis haikim menilaii baihwai pemidainaiain tidaik hainyai bertujuain untuk menimbulkain efek jerai paidai pelaikunyai tetaipi lebih penting laigi aidailaih sebaigaii upaiyai pemidainaiain terhaidaip terdaikwai. Kemudiain terkaiit dengain faiktai-faiktai yaing terungkaip dipersidaingain putusain yaing dijaituhkain haikim Pengaidilain Negeri yaiitu 1 taihun dain 10 bulain ini saingait ringain jikai dibaindingkain dailaim Paisail 45 aiyait (3) UU ITE yaing menjaituhkain hukumain maiksimail 4 taihun penjairai dengain dendai Rp 750.000.000,00 (tujuh raitus limai puluh jutai rupiaih), belum sesuaii dengain keaidilain substaintif, kairenai haikim kuraing mempertimbaingkain kerugiain moril yaing dideritai korbain aikibait penghinaiain dain pencemairain naimai baiik yaing dilaikukain terdaikwai. Selaiin itu pidainai tersebut kuraing memberikain efek jerai kepaidai pelaiku dain tidaik berfungsi memberikain pembelaijairain kepaidai pelaiku laiinnyai. Sairain dailaim penelitiain ini, haikim yaing menaingaini tindaik pidainai mentrainsmisikain informaisi elektronik yaing bermuaitain pencemairain naimai baiik paidai maisai mendaitaing disairainkain untuk daipait menjaituhkain pidainai secairai tepait, sehinggai daipait memberikain efek jerai dain sebaigaii pembelaijairain baigi pihaik laiin untuk tidaik melaikukain tindaik pidainai mentrainsmisikain informaisi elektronik yaing bermuaitain pencemairain naimai baiik. Sehinggai putusain yaing dijaituhkain sesuaii dengain faiktai-faiktai yaing terungkaip di persidaingain. Kata kunci: Putusan Hakim, Informasi Elektronik, Pencemaran Nama Baik. The crime of defamation and or libel in the field of Information and Electronic Transactions is one of the forms of criminal acts that occur in society arising from the development of information and communication technology. For example, in the case of defamation verdict Number: 142/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Kbu with the defendant Gati Maulia who was charged with 3 years in prison, but the judge sentenced her to 1 year and 10 months in prison. The problem in this study is what is the basis for the judge's consideration in sentencing the perpetrator of the crime of transmitting electronic information that defames and whether the judge's decision is in accordance with the facts in the trial. The research method in this writing is using a normative juridical approach. The sources in this research are Kotabumi District Court Judges and Lecturers of the Criminal Law Section of the Faculty of Law, University of Lampung. Data collection analysis with literature study and field studies conducted qualitatively. Based on the results of the research and discussion of the author, it can be concluded that decision number: 142/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Kbu consists of juridical, sociological and philosophical considerations. Juridically, namely the actions of the defendant Article 45 Paragraph (1) Jo. Article 27 Paragraph (3) of the ITE Law. Sociologically, the judge considered the aggravating and mitigating circumstances in the imposition of punishment. Philosophically, the judge considered that the punishment was not only aimed at creating a deterrent effect on the perpetrator but more importantly as an effort to punish the defendant. Then related to the facts revealed in the trial, the verdict imposed by the District Court judge, namely 1 year and 10 months, is very light when compared to Article 45 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law which imposes a maximum sentence of 4 years in prison with a fine of Rp 750,000,000.00 (seven hundred and fifty million rupiah), not in accordance with justice Substantive, because the judge did not consider the moral loss suffered by the victim due to the insult and defamation committed by the defendant. In addition, the punishment does not provide a deterrent effect to the perpetrator and does not serve to provide learning to other perpetrators. Suggestions in this study, judges who handle criminal acts of transmitting electronic information containing defamation in the future are advised to be able to impose appropriate punishment, so as to provide a deterrent effect and as a lesson for other parties not to commit criminal acts of transmitting electronic information containing defamation. So that the verdict imposed is in accordance with the facts revealed at trial. Keywords: Judge's Decision, Electronic Information, Defamation.

Jenis Karya Akhir: Skripsi
Subyek: 300 Ilmu sosial
300 Ilmu sosial > 340 Ilmu hukum
Program Studi: FAKULTAS HUKUM (FH) > Prodi S1-Ilmu Hukum
Pengguna Deposit: A.Md Cahya Anima Putra .
Date Deposited: 23 Oct 2025 07:46
Terakhir diubah: 23 Oct 2025 07:46
URI: http://digilib.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/91863

Actions (login required)

Lihat Karya Akhir Lihat Karya Akhir
Digital Library is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.