%A 0814023062 Bondan Galuh Yoga Pratama %T ANALISIS PENDAPATAN DAN TINGKAT KESEJAHTERAAN RUMAH TANGGA PETANI BUAH NAGA (Hylocereus Undatus Sp) DI KECAMATAN SRAGI KABUPATEN LAMPUNG SELATAN %X Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk ( 1 ) menganalisis tingkat pendapatan rumah tangga petani buah naga , dan ( 2 ) menentukan tingkat kesejahteraan petani buah naga . Penelitian ini dilakukan secara purposiv di Kecamatan Sragi Kabupaten Lampung Selatan . Semua 40 petani buah naga menjadi responden . Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode kuantitatif dan deskriptif kualitatif. Pendapatan rumah tangga petani buah naga di Kecamatan Sragi Kabupaten Lampung Selatan berasal dari pertanian buah naga sebesar Rp 89.518.362 / tahun ( 87,92 % ) , pertanian selain buah naga sebesar Rp 8.350.725 / tahun ( 8,20 % ) , kemudian dari luar kegiatan pertanian sebesar Rp 2.106.000 / tahun ( 2,07 % ) dan kegiatan non pertanian sebesar Rp 1.841.250 / tahun ( 1,81 % ) . Berdasarkan kriteria Sajogyo (1997 ) serta kriteria BPS ( 2007) 95 % dari petani rumah tangga dikategorikan sejahtera dan 5 % belum sejahtera . Kata kunci: Pendapatan Rumah Tangga, Kemiskinan, Kesejahteraan. ANALYSIS OF INCOME AND WELFARE OF DRAGON FRUIT (Hylocereus Undatus Sp) FARMER HOUSEHOLDS IN SRAGI SUBDISTRICT OF SOUTH LAMPUNG DISTRICT The purposes of this study were to (1) analyze the level of household income of dragon fruit farmers, and (2) determine the level of welfare of the farmers. This research was carried out in purposively chosen Sragi Subdistrict of South Lampung District. All 40 dragon fruit farmers were respondents. Data were analyzed using quantitative and descriptive qualitative methods. Annual household income of dragon fruit farmers in Sragi subdistrict the South Lampung Regency came from dragon fruit farming Rp 89,518,362/year (87.92%), from farming other than dragon fruit Rp 8,350,725/year (8.20%), from offfarm activities Rp 2,106,000/year (2.07%) and nonfarm activities Rp1,841,250/year (1.81%). Based on the Sajogyo (1997) criteria as well as BPS (2007) criteria 95% of farmer households was categorized prosperous and 5% was less prosperous. Key words: Household Income, Poverty, Welfare. %C UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG %D 2015 %I FAKULTAS PERTANIAN %L eprints12355