%A Angginesa Pradika 0814023005
%J Digital Library
%T ANALISIS EFISIENSI PRODUKSI DAN PEMASARAN
UBI JALAR (Ipomoea batatas) DI KABUPATEN LAMPUNG TENGAH
%X Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk : (1) menganalisis efisiensi penggunaan fungsi
produksi usahatani ubi jalar di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah dan (2) menganalisis
efisiensi pemasaran ubi jalar di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Penentuan lokasi
penelitian dilakukan secara sengaja. Responden petani diambil secara acak
sederhana dan responden lembaga pemasaran diambil dengan metode mengikuti
alur pemasaran. Data yang digunakan meliputi data primer dan data sekunder.
Responden penelitian terdiri dari 52 orang petani ubi jalar, 10 orang pedagang
pengumpul, 5 orang pedagang besar, 12 orang pedagang pengecer I dan 2 orang
pedagang pengecer II di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Data sekunder diperoleh
dari berbagai literatur dan beberapa instansi, seperti BPS, Dinas Pertanian, dan
instansi/lembaga terkait. Pengumpulan data dilaksanakan pada bulan April- Mei
2012. Metode analisis data meliputi analisis efisiensi produksi ubi jalar, dan
analisis efisiensi pemasaran ubi jalar.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa : (1) penggunaan fimgsi produksi usahatani
ubi jalar belum efisien. Dilihat dari uji-F faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh nyata
terhadap produksi usahatani ubi jalar adalah pupuk kandang (X4), pupuk KC1
(X5), pupuk NPK (X6), pupuk SP-36 (X7), dan HOK (X10), sedangkan bibit dan
luas lahan (X21), pestisida regen (X?) dan pestisida fliradan (X9) tidak berpengaruh
nyata dan proses produksi berada pada daerah Increasing return to scale. Secara
teknik usahatani ubi jalar sudah cukup efisien yaitu sebesar 73,57 persen,
sehingga petani hanya perlu meningkatkan potensi sebesar 26,43 persen. (2)
sistem pemasaran ubi jalar belum efisien, jika dilihat dari (a) struktur pasar yang
terbentuk adalah oligopsoni, (b) perilaku pasar petani, yaitu sistem pembayaran
dilakukan secara tunai dan melalui proses tawar-menawar, (c) keragaan pasar,
yaitu terdapat empat saluran pemasaran, (d) nilai pangsa produsen dibawah 70
persen, (e) marjin pemasaran dan RPM penyebarannya tidak merata, (f) elastisitas
transmisi harga bemilai 0,69 (Et < 1) yang menunjukkan bahwa pasar yang terjadi
adalah tidak bersaing sempuma.










Abstract

The research was aimed to : (1) analyze the efficiency of the usage of production
function of sweet potato in Central Lampung regency and (2) analyze the
efficiency of the marketing of sweet potato in Central Lampung regency. The
location was determined purposively. Seed breeder respondents taken by simple
random sampling and marketing channels respondents taken by flow of marketing
method. Data consist of primary and secondary data. The respondents consisted of
52 sweet potato farmers, 10 traders, 5 wholesalers, 12 retailers I and 2 II retailers
in Central Lampung regency. Secondary data were obtained from various
literatures and some institutions, such as the Central Bureau Statistic, Department
of Agriculture, and other institutions. Data were collected in April- May 2012.
Data analysis methods include the analysis of sweet potato production efficiency
and efficiency marketing analysis of sweet potato.
The results showed that: (1) the production functions use of sweet potato has not
efficient. By using the F-test, factors that significantly affected the production of
sweet potato farming were manure (X4), KC1 (X5), fertilizer NPK (X6), SP-36
(X7), and HOK (X10), while seedlings and land area (X21), pesticides reagent
(X8) and the pesticide Furadan (X9) had no significant effect and the production
process was in the region of increasing returns to scale. Sweet potato farming
technique was efficient in the amount of 73.57 percent, so farmers have to
increase their is potential for only 26.43 percent. (2) the marketing systems of
sweet potato had not efficient yet, because (a) the market structure that was
formed was oligopsoni, (b) the behavior of the farmers market, the system of
payments made in cash and through the bargaining process, (c) market variability,
ie there were four marketing channels, (d) the value of the share manufacturers
below 70 percent, (e) marketing margins and uneven distribution RPM, (f)
elasticity of price transmission was 0.69 (Et <1 ) indicating that the market did not
compete perfectly.
%D 2012
%L eprints12563