%0 Journal Article
%A 0743022043, Risky Mayang Sari
%D 2012
%F eprints:15550
%J Digital Library
%T PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA SISWA ANTARA   PEMBELAJARAN PENDEKATAN KETERAMPILAN   PROSES DAN PENDEKATAN CTL (CONTEXTUAL    TEACHING AND LEARNING)
%U http://digilib.unila.ac.id/15550/
%X Hasil belajar fisika siswa SMA PGRI 1 Tumijajar masih sangat rendah dan belum   memenuhi Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal (KKM). Sehingga pembelajaran   pendekatan CTL dan pembelajaran pendekatan keterampilan proses mampu   meningkatkan hasil belajar fisika siswa.      Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan rata-rata hasil belajar   fisika siswa sebelum dan sesudah menggunakan pendekatan CTL; (2) Perbedaan   rata-rata hasil belajar fisika siswa sebelum dan sesudah menggunakan pendekatan   keterampilan proses; (3) Perbedaan hasil belajar fisika siswa dengan   menggunakan pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan keterampilan proses.     Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen dengan bentuk Quasi   Eksperiment dengan tipe Pretest-Posttest Non Equivalent Control Group Design   dan lokasi penelitian di SMA PGRI 1 Tumijajar. Sampel diambil dua kelas yaitu   kelas X2 dan X3. Teknik analisis data hasil belajar menggunakan skor pretest dan   posttest, skor N-gain dan pengujian hipotesis menggunakan uji Paired Sampel t-Test dan Independent Sample t-Test.   Selanjutnya untuk menguji ada perbedaan antara variabel bebas dengan variabel   terikat dengan menggunakan uji Paired Sampel t-Test dan Independent Sample t-  Test. Hasil analisis data terdapat perbedaan antara: (1) hasil belajar fisika siswa   sebelum dan sesudah pembelajaran dengan menggunakan pendekatan CTL yang   ditunjukkan oleh nilai sig sebesar 0,000, (2) sedangkan dengan pendekatan   keterampilan proses yang ditunjukkan oleh nilai sig sebesar 0,000, (3) hasil   belajar fisika siswa dengan menggunakan pendekatan CTL dan keterampilan   proses yang ditunjukkan oleh nilai sig sebesar 0,000. Karena nilai sig tersebut   jauh dibawah α (0,05) maka, secara umum disimpulkan bahwa semua H0 ditolak.      The result of physics learning students’ of SMA PGRI 1 Tumijajar was still very   low and had not reached the Minimum Passing Grade (MPG). So the instructional   of CTL approach and the instructional of skill process approach could increase the   result of students’ physics learning.   The aim of this research were to understand about: (1) the difference of average   between students’ physics learning result before and after using CTL; (2) the   difference of average between students’ physics learning result before and after   using skill process approach; (3) the difference of average between students’   physics learning result by using CTL approach and skill process approach.   This reaserch used experimental method that is Quasi Experiment by Pretest-  Posttest Non Equivalent Control Group Design type and the location of the   research was on SMA PGRI 1 Tumijajar. Sample was taken from two classes that   were class X2 and class X3. Data analysis technique of learning result used pretest and posttest score, N-Gain score and  testing hypothesis used Paired Sampel t-Test and Independent Sampel t-Test.     Furthermore, to examine that there was difference between independent variable   and dependent variable by using Paired Sample t-Test and Independent Sample t-  Test.from the result of data analysis there was difference between: (1) the result of students’ physics learning before and after using the instructional of CTL   approach that shown by 0,000 sig value, (2) the result of students’ physics   learning before and after using the instructional skill process approach that shown by 0,000 sig value, (3) the result of students’ physics learning by using CTL approach and skill process approach that shown by 0,000 sig value. Because of   the sig value was lower under α (0,05) so, generally, it can be concluded that all of H0 was rejected.