?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.title=THE+COMPARATIVE+STUDY+BETWEEN+REFLECTIVITY+AND+IMPULSIVITY+COGNITIVE+STYLE+IN+USING+LEARNING+STRATEGY+IN+READING+AND+READING+COMPREHENSION+ON+SECOND+GRADERS+OF+MAN+2+BANDAR+LAMPUNG&rft.creator=Nabila+Ayu+Nisa%2C+1413042045&rft.subject=L+Education+(General)+%3D+Pendidikan+&rft.subject=PE+English&rft.description=The+aims+of+this+study+are+to+find+out+whether+(i)+reflective+or+impulsive+students+did+better+reading+comprehension+and+(ii)+there+is+significant+difference+between+impulsive+and+reflective+students+in+using+different+learning+strategy+in+reading.%0D%0AThe+subjects+were+35+students+of+XI+IPA+1+at+MAN+2+Bandar+Lampung+in+2017%2F2018+academic+year.+The+students+were+classified+into+reflectivity%2Fimpulsivity+by+using+Matching+Familiar+Figure+Test+(MFFT)+by+Kagan+(1966)+and+there+were+only+12+reflective+students+and+10+impulsive+students.+Then%2C+in+order+to+find+students%E2%80%99+preferences+in+learning+strategy%2C+Language+Learning+Strategy+Questionnaire+by+Setiyadi+(2011)+is+used.+In+seeking+for+the+reliability+of+reading+test%2C+there+were+two+raters+to+assess+students%E2%80%99+reading+comprehension+test+used+as+the+instrument.+The+data+was+analyzed+by+using+One+Way+ANOVA+in+which+the+mean+score+of+each+group+was+compared.+Then%2C+to+find+the+significant+difference+of+each+group+in+using+learning+strategy%2C+Independent+Sample+T-Test+was+used+and+determined+by+%CE%B1+%3C+0.05.+Hypothesis+testing+was+computed+using+Statistical+Package+for+Social+Science+(SPSS).%0D%0ABased+on+the+calculation+of+One+Way+ANOVA+descriptions%2C+the+result+showed+that+the+reflectivestudents%E2%80%99+mean+score+reading+comprehension+was+higher+impulsive+students+(7.69+%3E+7.47)+which+means+that+reflective+students+did+better+in+reading+comprehension+than+the+impulsive+ones.+The+results+of+the+independent+sample+test+indicated+that+the+significant+(2-tailed)+value+was+0.533+(0.533+%3E+0.05).+It+showed+that+the+hypothesis+was+rejected+that+there+is+no+significant+difference+between+reflective+and+impulsive+students+in+using+different+learning.+The+result+shows+that+reflective+students+used+metacognitive+strategy+at+first%2C+then+cognitive+style+and+social+strategy.+While+impulsive+students+used+social+strategy+first%2C+metacognitive+then+cognitive+strategy.&rft.publisher=FAKULTAS+KEGURUAN+DAN+ILMU+PENDIDIKAN&rft.date=2018-06-26&rft.type=Skripsi&rft.type=NonPeerReviewed&rft.format=text&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fdigilib.unila.ac.id%2F32296%2F1%2FABSTRACT.pdf&rft.format=text&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fdigilib.unila.ac.id%2F32296%2F2%2FSKRIPSI%2520FULL.pdf&rft.format=text&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fdigilib.unila.ac.id%2F32296%2F3%2FSKRIPSI%2520TANPA%2520BAB%2520PEMBAHASAN.pdf&rft.identifier=++Nabila+Ayu+Nisa%2C+1413042045++(2018)+THE+COMPARATIVE+STUDY+BETWEEN+REFLECTIVITY+AND+IMPULSIVITY+COGNITIVE+STYLE+IN+USING+LEARNING+STRATEGY+IN+READING+AND+READING+COMPREHENSION+ON+SECOND+GRADERS+OF+MAN+2+BANDAR+LAMPUNG.++FAKULTAS+KEGURUAN+DAN+ILMU+PENDIDIKAN%2C+UNIVERSITAS+LAMPUNG.+++++&rft.relation=http%3A%2F%2Fdigilib.unila.ac.id%2F32296%2F