title: ANALISIS KOMPARATIF TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK SYARIAH  DAN BANK KONVENSIONAL DI INDONESIA MENGGUNAKAN  PENDEKATAN RGEC PERIODE 2014-2017
creator: Prihantari Wahyuningtyas, 1411011100
subject: HD28 Management. Industrial Management
subject: HG Finance
description: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbedaan tingkat kesehatan bank  syariah dan bank konvensional dengan menggunakan metode RGEC: (Risk  profile, Good Coorporate Governance, Earning, dan Capital). Penggunaan  metode RGEC telah ditetapkan oleh BI (Bank Indonesia) digunakan sejak 2012  dan ditetapkan dalam PBI nomor 13/1/ PBI/2011. Penelitian ini mengobservasi 7  bank syariahdan 7 bank konvensional selama periode 4 tahun sehingga didapat 56  sample. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan faktor risk profile yang  diukur dengan NPL dan LDR maka hasil perhitungan Non Performing Loan  (NPL) adalah tidak terdapat perbedaan antara perbankan syariah dan perbankan  konvensional di Indonesia, berdasarkan Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) menunjukan  hasil yang sama yaitu tidak terdapat perbedaan antara perbankan syariah dan  perbankan konvensional di Indonesia. Berdasarkan Good Coorporate Governance  (GCG) terdapat perbedaan antara bank syariah dan bank konvensional di  Indonesia. Berdasarkan Earning yang diukur dengan ROA dan NIM maka  berdasarkan pengukuran Return On Asset (ROA) terdapat perbedaan antara bank  syariah dengan bank konvensional sedangkan dilihat dari pengukuran Net Interest  Margin (NIM) tidak terdapat perbedaan antara perbankan syariah dan perbankan  konvensional di Indonesia. Berdasarkan faktor Capital yang diukur dengan  Capital Adequancy Ratio (CAR) tidak terdapat perbedaan antara perbankan  syariah dengan perbankan konvensional di Indonesia.  Kata Kunci : Analisis komparatif, Bank Syariah, Bank Konvensional,  metode RGEC, Risk profile, Good Coorporate Governance, Earning, Capital        ABSTRACT    This study aims to analyze the different of health level islamic banks and  conventional banks using RGEC method : (Risk Profile, Good Coorporate  Governance, Earning, and Capital). The use of the RGEC method has been  established by BI (Bank Indonesia) effective since 2012 and stipulated in PBI no.  13/1/ PBI/2011. This study observed 7 islamic banks and 7 conventional banks  over a period of 4 years to obtain 56 samples. The results showed that based on  the risk profile factor measured by NPL and LDR, the result of Non Performing  Loan (NPL) calculation is that there is no difference between islamic banking and  conventional banking in Indonesia, based on Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) there  is a difference between islamic banking and conventional banking in Indonesia.  Based on Good Corporate Governance (GCG) there is a difference between  islamic banking and conventional banking in Indonesia. Based on earning  measured by ROA and NIM then based on measurement Return On Asset (ROA)  there is difference between islamic banking with conventional banking while seen  from measurement of Net Interest Margin (NIM) there is no difference between  islamic banking and conventional banking in Indonesia. Based on Capital factor  measured by Capital Adequancy Ratio (CAR), there is no difference between  islamic banking and conventional banking in Indonesia.  Keyword : Comparative Analysis, Islamic Banks, Conventional Banks, RGEC  method, Risk Profile, Good Coorporate Governance, Earning, Capital
publisher: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis
date: 2018-07-12
type: Skripsi
type: NonPeerReviewed
format: text
identifier: http://digilib.unila.ac.id/32722/1/ABSTRAK.pdf
format: text
identifier: http://digilib.unila.ac.id/32722/2/SKRIPSI%20FULL.pdf
format: text
identifier: http://digilib.unila.ac.id/32722/3/SKRIPSI%20TANPA%20BAB%20PEMBAHASAN.pdf
identifier:   Prihantari Wahyuningtyas, 1411011100  (2018) ANALISIS KOMPARATIF TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK SYARIAH DAN BANK KONVENSIONAL DI INDONESIA MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN RGEC PERIODE 2014-2017.  Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Lampung.     
relation: http://digilib.unila.ac.id/32722/