@misc{eprints57172, month = {Pebruari}, title = {STUDI PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR EKONOMI MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE COOPERATIVE SCRIPT, JIGSAW, DAN EVERYONE IS A TEACHER HERE DENGAN MEMPERHATIKAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI 17 BANDAR LAMPUNG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2018/2019 }, author = {1513031022 By MAILA NI?AMASSHODIQOH}, address = {UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG}, publisher = {Fakultas Keguruan Ilmu Pendidikan }, year = {2019}, url = {http://digilib.unila.ac.id/57172/}, abstract = {Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar ekonomi, interaksi penggunaan model pembelajaran Cooperative Script, Jigsaw dan Everyone Is a Teacher Here dengan memperhatikan motivasi berprestasi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan pendekatan komparatif. Pengumpulan data melalui lembar angket, soal tes dan dianalisis dengan rumus t-test dan ANAVA menggunakan perhitungan manual dan SPSS. Penelitian ini dilakukan di SMAN 17 Bandar Lampung dengan populasi sebanyak 5 kelas dan sampel 3 kelas yang ditentukan melalui Cluster Random Sampling. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan Fhitung {\ensuremath{>}} Ftabel atau 3,176 {\ensuremath{>}} 3,11 berarti ada perbedaan hasil belajar mengunakan model Cooperative Script, Jigsaw dan Everyone Is a Teacher Here dan Fhitung {\ensuremath{>}} Ftabel atau 35,606 {\ensuremath{>}} 3,11 berarti terdapat interaksi model pembelajaran dengan motivasi berprestasi. Kata Kunci: hasil belajar, motivasi berprestasi, cs, jigsaw, eth The purpose of this research was to find out the difference of economic study result, interaction in CS learning model, Jigsaw, and ETH by seeing the achievement motivation. The Research method was quasi experiment by appraoching comparatively. Data collecting technique used in this research was questionnaire, test questions, and analysed by using t-test formula and ANOVA manually and SPSS. This research was done in SMAN 17 Bandar Lampung with the population 5 classes and 3 classes as samples which were determined through cluster random sampling. The result of the analysis showed F count {\ensuremath{>}} F table or 3.176 {\ensuremath{>}} 3.11 which means there is difference study result through CS learning model, Jigsaw, and ETH and F count {\ensuremath{>}} F table or 35.606 {\ensuremath{>}} 3.11 which means there is a learning model interaction with achievement motivation. Keywords: study result, achievement motivation, cs, jigsaw, eth} }