<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) "^^ . "\r\nBinary option menjadi semakin akrab bagi publik dengan keberadaan promosi \r\nonline yang dilakukan diberbagai sosial media oleh affiliator. Akhir-akhir ini\r\npembicaraan situs Binomo semakin marak, contohnya ialah kasus yang menimpa\r\nIndra Kesuma atau yang dikenal sebagai Indra Kenz. Indra Kenz ialah affiliator\r\ndalam aplikasi Binomo. Kaitannya antara affiliator binary option dengan tindak\r\npidana pencucian uang ialah seperti yang kita ketahui bahwa uang hasil dari\r\npromosi binary option merupakan uang illegal atau hasil kejahatan dikarenakan\r\nsudah ada regulasi yang mengatur bahwa binary option merupakan investasi\r\nillegal. Adapun permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah\r\npenegakan hukum terhadap affiliator binary option dalam tindak pidana\r\npencucian uang dan apa saja faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi penegakan hukum\r\nterhadap affiliator binary option dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang. \r\nPendekatan masalah dalam penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis\r\nnormatif dan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Data yang digunakan adalah data\r\nprimer, data sekunder dan data tersier. Adapun narasumber dalam penelitian ini\r\nadalah Penyidik pada direktorat tindak pidana ekonomi khusus, trader\r\ncryptocurrency di Bandar Lampung, Dosen bagian pidana dan perdata FH Unila.\r\nSedangkan pengolahan data yang diperoleh dengan cara seleksi data, klasifikasi\r\ndata dan sistematisasi data. Data hasil pengolahan tersebut dianalisis secara \r\nkualitatif dan ditarik kesimpulan dengan menggunakan metode induktif. \r\nBerdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat ditarik suatu kesimpulan\r\nbahwa penegakan hukum terhadap affiliator binary option dalam tindak pidana\r\npencucian uang dengan menggunakan teori kebijakan hukum pidana yang terdiri\r\ndari tiga tahap. Dengan mengambil contoh kasus pada Indra Kenz menggunakan\r\nteori kebijakan hukum pidana, yaitu pertama pada kebijakan hukum pidana yakni\r\nformulasi mengenai binary option dapat dikaitkan dengan Pasal 378 KUHP, Pasal\r\n303 Ayat (1) KUHP, Pasal 45A Ayat (1) Jo. Pasal 28 Ayat (1) UU ITE, Pasal 3\r\nUU TPPU. Sedangkan Pada penerapan aparat penegak hukum yaitu Jaksa\r\nPenuntut Umum pada kasus Indra Kenz menggunakan dakwaan dengan berbentuk\r\nalternatif kumulatif yakni Kesatu: Pertama Pasal 45 Ayat (2) Jo Pasal 27 Ayat (2)\r\nUU ITE; \r\n\r\nPada putusan pengadilan berdasarkan kasus Indra Kenz di pengadilan tingkat\r\npertama dengan Putusan Nomor:1240/Pid.Sus/2022 PN.Tng, Majelis Hakim\r\nsependapat dengan dakwaan dari jaksa penuntut umum yaitu dakwaan kesatu\r\nkedua yaitu Pasal 45A (1) Jo. Pasal 28 Ayat (1) UU ITE dan dakwaan kedua\r\npertama Penuntut Umum yaitu Pasal 3 UU TPPU. Lalu, melalui banding dengan\r\nPutusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Banten\r\nmenguatkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang dengan Indra Kenz di eksekusi\r\npidana penjara 10 Tahun dan denda Rp 5 Miliar dan barang bukti yang disita dari\r\nIndra Kenz dikembalikan untuk mengganti kerugian para korban. Sedangkan pada\r\nfaktor-faktor yang menjadi penghambat penegakan hukum mengenai afiiliator\r\nbinary option dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang yaitu pertama tentang faktor\r\nhukumnya itu sendiri bahwa regulasi tentang binary option masih belum jelas dan\r\naparat penegak hukum di Indonesia belum sepenuhnya mengerti dengan kejahatan\r\nsiber padahal pada sarana dan fasilitas mempunyai alat yang mumpuni tetapi tidak\r\nada orang yang dapat mengoperasikan alat tersebut. Masyarakat Indonesia mudah\r\nterjebak oleh affiliator binary option ini dikarenakan masyarakat Indonesia ingin\r\nsesuatu yang instan. Kemudian pada masyarakat Indonesia sendiri budaya hukum\r\ntidak terasah dengan baik, budaya pemahaman akan berinvestasi juga belum\r\nterasah dengan baik. \r\nSaran dari penulis kepada aparat penegak hukum mengenai penegakan hukum\r\nterhadap affiliator binary option dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang ialah\r\nplatform trading yang masih illegal untuk segera diberantas karena dapat\r\nmengakibatkan korban korban baru yang terjebak dalam dunia yang dapat\r\ndikatakan dengan perjudian online, dengan adanya pencegahan dan himbauan\r\nkepada masyarakat untuk lebih memperhatikan sistem trading yang terdaftar jika\r\ningin melakukan trading. Pada faktor penghambat penegakan hukum mengenai\r\naffiiliator binary option dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang, mungkin mulai saat\r\nini dapat dipenuhi semua kekurangan dari semua faktor tersebut. \r\nKata Kunci: Penegakan Hukum, Affiliator, Binary Option, Pencucian Uang\r\nABSTRACT\r\n \r\nLAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST BINARY OPTION AFFILIATORS \r\nIN THE CRIME OF MONEY LAUNDERING \r\n(Decision Study Number: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn)\r\n \r\nBy:\r\nDava Prawira Wibowo \r\n\r\nBinary options are becoming increasingly familiar to the public with the existence\r\nof online promotions carried out on various social media by affiliates. Lately, the\r\ndiscussion on the Binomo site has been getting busier, an example is the case that\r\nhappened to Indra Kesuma, also known as Indra Kenz. Indra Kenz is an affiliate\r\nin the Binomo application. The link between binary option affiliates and money\r\nlaundering crimes is as we know that money generated from binary option\r\npromotions is illegal money or proceeds of crime because there are already\r\nregulations governing that binary options are illegal investments. The problem in\r\nthis study is how is law enforcement against binary option affiliates involved in\r\nmoney laundering crimes and what are the factors that influence law enforcement\r\nagainst binary option affiliates in money laundering crimes.\r\n\r\nThe problem approach in this study uses a normative juridical approach and an\r\nempirical juridical approach. The data used are primary data, secondary data and\r\ntertiary data. The sources in this study were investigators at the directorate of\r\nspecial economic crimes, cryptocurrency traders in Bandar Lampung, lecturers in\r\nthe criminal and civil divisions of FH Unila. While processing the data obtained\r\nby means of data selection, data classification and data systematization. The\r\nprocessed data were analyzed qualitatively and conclusions were drawn using the\r\ninductive method.\r\n\r\nBased on the results of the research and discussion, a conclusion can be drawn\r\nthat law enforcement against binary option affiliators in money laundering crimes\r\nuses the theory of criminal law policy which consists of three stages. By taking\r\nthe example of the case in Indra Kenz using the theory of criminal law policy,\r\nnamely first on criminal law policy namely formulation regarding binary options\r\ncan be linked to Article 378 of the Criminal Code, Article 303 Paragraph (1) of\r\nthe Criminal Code, Article 45A Paragraph (1) Jo. Article 28 Paragraph (1) of the\r\nITE Law, Article 3 of the TPPU Law. Whereas in the application of law\r\nenforcement officials, namely the Public Prosecutor in the Indra Kenz case, using\r\ncharges in the form of cumulative alternatives, namely First: First Article 45\r\nParagraph (2) Jo Article 27 Paragraph (2) of the ITE Law; Or Second, Article 45A\r\nParagraph (1) Jo. \r\nDAVA PRAWIRA WIBOWO\r\nArticle 28 Paragraph (1) of the ITE Law; Or Third Article 378 of the Criminal\r\nCode; \r\nAnd Second First, Article 3 of the TPPU Law; Or Second, Article 4 of the Money\r\nLaundering Law In the court decision based on the Indra Kenz case at the first\r\nlevel court with Decision Number: 1240/Pid.Sus/2022 PN.Tng, the Panel of\r\nJudges agreed with the indictment of the public prosecutor, namely the second\r\nindictment, namely Article 45A ( 1) Jo. Article 28 Paragraph (1) of the ITE Law\r\nand the second indictment of the Public Prosecutor, namely Article 3 of the TPPU\r\nLaw. Then, through an appeal with Decision Number: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn\r\nThe Banten High Court Judge upheld the Tangerang District Court's Decision\r\nwith Indra Kenz being sentenced to 10 years in prison and a fine of IDR 5 billion\r\nand evidence confiscated from Indra Kenz returned to compensate the victims.\r\nWhereas the factors that become obstacles to law enforcement regarding binary\r\noption affiliators in money laundering crimes, namely, firstly, regarding the legal\r\nfactor itself, that the regulations regarding binary options are still unclear and law\r\nenforcement officials in Indonesia do not fully understand cybercrime even\r\nthough the means and facilities have qualified tools but no one who can operate\r\nthe tools. Indonesian people are easily trapped by these binary option affiliates\r\nbecause Indonesian people want something instant. Then in the Indonesian people\r\nthemselves the legal culture is not well honed, the culture of understanding that\r\ninvesting is also not well honed.\r\n\r\nSuggestions from the author to law enforcement officials regarding law\r\nenforcement against binary option affiliates in money laundering crimes are\r\ntrading platforms that are still illegal to eradicate immediately because they can\r\nresult in new victims trapped in a world that can be said with online gambling,\r\nwith prevention and appeals to the public to pay more attention to the registered\r\ntrading system if you want to trade. Regarding the inhibiting factors for law\r\nenforcement regarding binary option affiiliators in money laundering crimes,\r\nperhaps from now on all the deficiencies of all of these factors can be fulfilled.\r\n \r\nKeywords: Law Enforcement, Affiliators, Binary Options, Money\r\nLaundering \r\n"^^ . "2023-04-04" . . . . . "FAKULTAS HUKUM"^^ . . . . . . . "Prawira Wibowo "^^ . "Dava"^^ . "Prawira Wibowo Dava"^^ . . . . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (File PDF)"^^ . . . "ABSTRAK.pdf"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (File PDF)"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (File PDF)"^^ . . . "SKRIPSI FULL TANPA BAB PEMBAHASAN.pdf"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "indexcodes.txt"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "indexcodes.txt"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \r\nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG\r\n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . "HTML Summary of #70879 \n\nPENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP AFFILIATOR BINARY OPTION \nDALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG \n(Studi Putusan Nomor: 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.Btn) \n\n" . "text/html" . . . "340 Ilmu hukum" . . . "345 Hukum pidana" . .