TY  - THES
ID  - eprints73599
UR  - http://digilib.unila.ac.id/73599/
A1  - Restia , Apriani 
Y1  - 2023/06/13/
N2  - The aims of this study were to explore i) whether or not there was a
statistically significant difference of writing achievement between the students
taught through collaborative writing blended with mind mapping and those through
collaborative writing strategy, and ii) which aspect of writing had significantly
improvement between the two classes. There were two classes, experimental and
control classes, each of which consisted of 28 students at MTs Negeri 2 Bandar
Lampung. The data were collected through the pre and the post tests in the form of
essay writing. The gains of writing achievement in terms of content, organization,
vocabulary, syntax and mechanics, and were then compared using Independent Ttest. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between
the experimental and the control classes with the significant level, 0,05. That is,
the experimental class had better achievement of writing than the control class. In
addition, every single aspect of writing was also significantly different between the
two classes. This suggests that collaborative writing blended with mind mapping
facilitates the students to improve their writing achievement.
Keywords: Collaborative writing, mind mapping, blended learning.
PB  - UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG
M1  - masters
TI  - THE COMPARISON OF WRITING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN
THE STUDENTS TAUGHT THROUGH THE COLLABORATIVE
WRITING STRATEGY BLENDED WITH MIND MAPPING
AND THOSE THROUGH THE COLLABORATIVE
WRITING STRATEGY AT MTs NEGERI 2
BANDAR LAMPUNG
AV  - restricted
ER  -