TY  - THES
ID  - eprints82202
UR  - http://digilib.unila.ac.id/82202/
A1  - Widya , Rahayu	
Y1  - 2024/04/03/
N2  - Pada asasnya suatu putusan hanyalah mengikat para pihak yang berperkara dan
tidak mengikat pihak ketiga. Akan tetapi apabila pihak ketiga hak-haknya dirugikan
oleh suatu putusan, maka ia dapat mengajukan perlawanan atau gugatan ke
Pengadilan Tingkat Pertama. Dengan adanya putusan perkara pidana yang
diberikan oleh hakim yang menimbulkan kerugian terhadap pihak ketiga tersebut
maka pihak ketiga melakukan mengajukan gugatan secara perdata ke Pengadilan
Negeri (Tingkat Pertama) guna memperjuangkan haknya atas barang bukti tersebut,
yang dalam hal ini Pengadilan tidak boleh menolak memeriksa dan mengadili
perkara dengan alasan tidak ada diatur dalam Undang-Undang. Dengan adanya
keberatan tersebut maka pihak ketiga atas gugatan perlawanan pihak ketiga
tersebut, Majelis Hakim memberikan putusan bahwa barang bukti yang disita oleh
negara tersebut dikembalikan kepada pihak ketiga yang dalam hal ini pihak ketiga
tersebut sebagai Penggugat. Terdapat beberapa putusan yang dikaji dalam
penelitian ini yakni; Putusan Pengadilan Nomor: 71/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Jkt.Pst,
Nomor: 14/PDT.PLW/2014/PN.STB, Nomor: 46/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN Kpn, Nomor:
7/Pdt.G/2022/PN Gdt.
Permasalah dalam penelitian ini adalah apa yang menjadi alasan pihak ketiga
mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan, dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam memeriksa
dan memutus perkara gugatan pihak ketiga serta apa putusan hakim telah
memenuhi rasa keadilan dalam memutuskan perkara gugatan pihak ketiga. Tujuan
penelitian ini adalah menganalisis alasan pihak ketiga mengajukan gugatan ke
Pengadilan, memahami yang menjadi dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam memeriksa
dan memutus perkara gugatan pihak ketiga serta menganalisis sejauh mana
pertimbangan dalam putusan hakim telah memenuhi rasa keadilan dalam
penyelesaian perkara ini. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis
normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kasus.
Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah gugatan yang diajukan pihak ketiga ke Pengadilan
dikarenakan adanya ketidakpuasan pihak ketiga atas putusan pidana, pertimbangan
hakim dalam memutuskan perkara didasarkan atas fakta-fakta yang terungkap
selama proses persidangan dan pertimbangan hakim yang tertuang dalam putusan
perdata telah memenuhi rasa keadilan yang mengedepankan asas manfaat dan
kepastian hukum. Implikasi dari hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan
pemahaman yang lebih mendalam tentang proses pengambilan keputusan hakim
dalam kasus gugatan pihak ketiga terkait eksekusi barang sitaan yang dirampas
untuk negara. Selain itu, temuan penelitian ini juga diharapkan dapat memberikan

1

masukan bagi perbaikan sistem peradilan yang lebih efektif dan adil, serta
memperkuat perlindungan terhadap hak-hak pihak ketiga yang terlibat dalam
kasus-kasus eksekusi barang sitaan.

Kata Kunci: Barang Sitaan, Gugatan Pihak Ketiga, Pertimbangan Hakim.

In principle, a decision is only binding on the parties to the case and not binding
on third parties. However, if a third party's rights are harmed by a verdict, then he
or she can file an opposition or lawsuit to the Court of First Instance. With the
criminal case verdict given by the judge that caused harm to the third party, the
third party filed a civil lawsuit to the District Court (First Level) to fight for his
rights to the evidence, in which case the Court may not refuse to examine and hear
the case on the grounds that it is not regulated in the Law. With this objection, the
third party over the third party's resistance lawsuit, the Panel of Judges gave a
decision that the evidence confiscated by the state was returned to the third party,
in this case the third party as the Plaintiff. There are several decisions reviewed in
this study, namely; Court Decision Number: 71/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Jkt.Pst, Number:
14/PDT.PLW/2014/PN.STB, Number: 46/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN Kpn, Number:
7/Pdt.G/2022/PN Gdt.
The problem in this research is what is the reason why a third party files a lawsuit
in court, the basis for the judge's considerations in examining and deciding on a
third party lawsuit and whether the judge's decision fulfills a sense of justice in
deciding on a third party lawsuit. The purpose of this research is to analyze the
reasons why third parties file lawsuits with the court, understand the basis of the
judge's considerations in examining and deciding third party lawsuit cases and
analyze the extent to which the considerations in the judge's decision have fulfilled
the sense of justice in resolving this case. The research method used is normative
juridical using a case approach.
The result of this study is a lawsuit filed by a third party to the Court due to the
third party's dissatisfaction with the criminal verdict, the judge's consideration in
deciding the case is based on the facts revealed during the trial process and the
judge's consideration contained in the civil decision has fulfilled a sense of justice
that prioritizes the principles of benefit and legal certainty. The results of this
research are that a lawsuit was submitted by a third party to the court due to the
third party's dissatisfaction with the criminal decision, the judge's considerations
in deciding the case were based on the facts revealed during the trial process and
the judge's considerations stated in the civil decision fulfilled a sense of justice that
prioritizes the principle of benefit and legal certainty. It is hoped that the
implications of the results of this research will provide a deeper understanding of
the judge's decision-making process in cases of third party lawsuits regarding the
execution of confiscated goods confiscated for the state. Apart from that, it is also

1

hoped that the findings of this research can provide input for improving the justice
system to be more effective and fair, as well as strengthening the protection of the
rights of third parties involved in cases of execution of confiscated goods.

Keywords: Confiscated Goods, Third Party Lawsuit, Judge's Consideration
PB  - UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG
M1  - masters
TI  - ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM ATAS GUGATAN PIHAK KETIGA

TERHADAP EKSEKUSI BARANG SITAAN
YANG DIRAMPAS UNTUK NEGARA
AV  - restricted
ER  -