TY  - GEN
CY  - UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG
ID  - eprints82331
UR  - http://digilib.unila.ac.id/82331/
A1  - SALSABILA AULIA ASA, PRAMESTI
Y1  - 2024/07/10/
N2  - SALSABILA AULIA ASA PRAMESTI

PT Asiapac Pancamakmur Abadi (Debitur Pailit) telah dinyatakan pailit
dengan segala akibat hukumnya. Selanjutnya, Kurator yang ditetapkan demi hukum
berwenang mengambil alih pengurusan dan pemberesan harta (boedel) pailit sesuai
ketentuan UU Kepailitan. Kurator melakukan pencocokan piutang dengan
menyusun Daftar Pertelean Sementara dan memasukkan harta Penjamin
(Borgtocht) dalam boedel pailit. Borgtoch keberatan atas tindakan Kurator dan
mengajukan Gugatan Lain-Lain dan dilanjutkan dengan upaya hukum kasasi dan
peninjuan Kembali. Penelitian ini akan mengkaji dan membahas tentang alasan
Kurator memasukkan harta Borgtocht sebagai boedel pailit dan alasan hukum
tanggung jawab Borgtocht atas utang Debitur Pailit.
Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan tipe penelitian
deskriptif. Pendekatan masalah menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus putusan yang
telah berkekuatan hukum tetap. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder melalui
studi dokumen (putusan) dan studi kepustakaan. Selanjutnya, data diolah melalui
pemeriksaan data, editing, dan sistematisasi data, serta dianalisis secara kualitatif.
Hasil penelitian dan pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa alasan Kurator
memasukkan harta Borgtocht sebagai boedel pailit telah sesuai dengan kewenangan
yang ditentukan dalam UU Kepailitan dan dibenarkan oleh Majelis Hakim Agung
Dalam perkara ini, Borgtocht merupakan pihak yang telah mengikatkan harta
pribadinya dengan jaminan hak tanggungan atas pinjaman Debitur Pailit. Hal ini
dibuktikan dengan Borgtocht telah membuat pernyataan secara otentik di muka
Notaris. Akta Borgtocht menyatakan bersedia menanggung kewajiban Debitur
Pailit. Alasan Kurator tersebut telah dibenarkan dalam Putusan Peninjauan Kembali
yang menguatkan Putusan Kasasi untuk memasukkan harta Borgtocht ke dalam
boedel pailit. Untuk itu, beralasan hukum bagi Borgtocht bertanggung jawab atas
utang Debitur Pailit. Tanggung jawab tersebut menjadi melekat dan wajib
dilaksanakan dalam hal Debitur Pailit berada dalam keadaan insolvensi sehingga
sah dan beralasan hukum harta Borgtocht digunakan untuk melunasi utang-utang
Debitur Pailit.
Kata Kunci: Borgtocht, Gugatan Lain-Lain, Hukum Kepailitan.

SALSABILA AULIA ASA PRAMESTI

PT Asiapac Pancamakmur Abadi (Bankrupt Debtor) has been declared
bankrupt with all the legal consequences. Furthermore, the Curator who is
appointed by law has the authority to take over the management and settlement of
the bankrupt's assets (boedel) in accordance with the provisions of the Bankruptcy
Law. The curator reconciles the receivables by compiling a Temporary Disposal
List and including the Guarantor's assets (Borgtocht) in the bankruptcy filing.
Borgtoch objected to the Curator's actions and filed a Miscellaneous Lawsuit and
continued with cassation and reconsideration. This research will examine and
discuss the Curator's reasons for including Borgtocht's assets as bankruptcy debt
and the legal reasons for Borgtocht's responsibility for the Bankrupt Debtor's debts.
This type of research is normative legal research with descriptive research
type. The problem approach uses a case study approach to decisions that have
permanent legal force. The data used is secondary data through document studies
(decisions) and literature studies. Next, the data was processed through data
checking, editing, and data systematization, and analyzed qualitatively.
The results of the research and discussion show that the Curator's reasons
for including Borgtocht's assets as a bankrupt boedel are in accordance with the
authority specified in the Bankruptcy Law and confirmed by the Supreme Court of
Justice. In this case, Borgtocht is the party who has tied up his personal assets with
collateral for mortgage rights on the Bankrupt Debtor's loans. This is proven by
Borgtocht having made an authentic statement before a Notary. The Borgtocht
Deed states that it is willing to assume the obligations of the Bankrupt Debtor. The
Curator's reasons were confirmed in the Judicial Review Decision which upheld the
Cassation Decision to include Borgtocht's assets in the bankruptcy court. For this
reason, it is legal for Borgtocht to be responsible for the debts of the Bankrupt
Debtor. This responsibility becomes inherent and must be carried out in the event
that the Bankrupt Debtor is in a state of insolvency so that it is legal and legal for
the Borgtocht assets to be used to pay off the Bankrupt Debtor's debts.
Keywords: Borgtocht, Miscellaneous Lawsuit, Bankruptcy Law.
PB  - FAKULTAS HUKUM
TI  - IMPLEMENTASI HUKUM TANGGUNG JAWAB BORGTOCHT

DALAM KEPAILITAN

(Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 42 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022)
AV  - restricted
ER  -