ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA JAKARTA NOMOR 62/G/2015/PTUN-JKT TENTANG SENGKETA KEPENGURUSAN PARTAI GOLKAR

Hestika Dwi Ningrum, 1212011140 (2016) ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA JAKARTA NOMOR 62/G/2015/PTUN-JKT TENTANG SENGKETA KEPENGURUSAN PARTAI GOLKAR. FAKULTAS HUKUM, UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG.

[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
ABSTRAK.pdf

Download (16Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
ABSTRACT.pdf

Download (15Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
COVER DALAM.pdf

Download (19Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
MENYETUJUI.pdf

Download (204Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
MENGESAHKAN.pdf

Download (194Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf

Download (14Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
PERSEMBAHAN.pdf

Download (8Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
MOTO.pdf

Download (18Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
SANWACANA.pdf

Download (18Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
DAFTAR ISI.pdf

Download (10Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
BAB I.pdf

Download (44Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
BAB II.pdf

Download (104Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
BAB III.pdf

Download (25Kb) | Preview
[img] FIle PDF
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Hanya pengguna terdaftar

Download (213Kb)
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
BAB V.pdf

Download (17Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
FIle PDF
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (19Kb) | Preview

Abstrak

Hasil putusan Mahkamah Partai Golkar berturut-turut Nomor 01/PIGOLKAR/ II/2015, Nomor 02/PI-GOLKAR/II/2015 dan Nomor 03/PIGOLKAR/ II/2015 ketiganya tertanggal 3 Maret 2015 yang dijadikan sebagai landasan dikeluarkannya SK Menteri Hukum dan HAM tentang Pengesahan Perubahan Anggaran Dasar, Anggaran Rumah Tangga serta Komposisi dan Personalia DPP Partai Golkar yang mengesahkan pihak H.R Agung Laksono sebagai Ketua Umum Partai Golkar. Pihak Ir. Aburizal Bakrie merasa dirugikan dengan dikeluarkannya SK tersebut, pihaknya mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta. Penelitian ini mengkaji mengenai putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta tentang Sengketa Kepengurusan Partai Golkar. Adapun yang menjadi permasalahan dalam penelitian adalah pertama, pertimbangan hukum majelis hakim sehingga membatalkan SK Menteri Hukum dan HAM RI Nomor M.HH-01.AH.11.01 Tahun 2015 tanggal 23 Maret 2015 dan memberlakukan SK Menteri Hukum dan HAM RI Nomor M.HH-21.AH.11.01 Tahun 2012 tanggal 04 September 2012 dan kedua, dampak hukum dan kekuatan hukum dari putusan PTUN Jakarta Nomor 62/G/2015/PTUN-JKT tentang Sengketa Kepengurusan Partai Golkar. Pendekatan masalah yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan normatif. Sumber data menggunakan data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi pustaka dan studi dokumen. Analisis data menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa: pertama, pertimbangan hukum majelis hakim sehingga membatalkan SK Menteri Hukum dan HAM Nomor M.HH- 01.AH.11.01 Tahun 2015 tanggal 23 Maret 2015 dan memberlakukan SK Menteri Hukum dan HAM RI Nomor M.HH-21.AH.11.01 Tahun 2012 tanggal 04 September 2012, yaitu guna menghindari kekosongan kepengurusan DPP Partai Golkar sebagai akibat ditunda dan dibatalkannya surat keputusan obyek sengketa oleh Pengadilan serta guna memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi Partai Golkar Hestika Dwi Ningrum untuk ikut serta pada Pilkada serentak dan kedua, dampak hukum dan kekuatan hukum dari putusan PTUN Jakarta Nomor 62/G/2015/PTUN-JKT yaitu membatalkan dan mewajibkan Menteri Hukum dan HAM mencabut SK Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor M.HH-01.AH.11.01 Tahun 2015, kekuatan putusan tersebut masih berlaku, sudah tepat dan benar. Majelis Kasasi sependapat dengan dengan pertimbangan hukum tersebut Kata Kunci: Putusan, Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim, Dampak Hukum dan Kekuatan Hukum. THE COURT RULING ANALYSIS OF STATE ADMINISTRATION IN JAKARTA NO. 62/G/2015/PTUN-JKT ABOUT MANAGEMENT DISPUTE OF GOLKAR PARTY By: HESTIKA DWI NINGRUM The results of Internal ruling Golkar Party No. 01/PI-GOLKAR/II/2015, No. 02/PI-GOLKAR/II/2015 and No. 03/PI-GOLKAR/II/2015 three of them on March 3rd, 2015 become the basis of decree release of The Minister of Justice and Human Rights about Amendment Endorsement of Articles of Association, Bylaws, also Composition and Personnel in Golkar Party Council who certify HR. Agung Laksono as Golkar Party Chairman. Ir. Aburizal Bakrie financial loss with decree release, he persue a claim to the State Administration Court in Jakarta. This study find out the court ruling Jakarta State Administration Court about Management Dispute of Golkar Party. The problems in this study are first, legal consideration of committee that cancel the Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights No. M.HH-01.AH.11.01 in 2015 on March 23rd, 2015 and Implement of Decree of The Minister of Justice and Human Rights No. M.HH- 21.AH.11.01 in 2012 on September 04th, 2012 and second, the impact of law and legal force from the decision of Jakarta State Administration Court No. 62/G/2015/PTUN-JKT about Management Dispute of Golkar Party. The approach that is used in this study is normative approach. The data source is second data which consist of primery law materials, secondary law materials and tertiary law materials. The data collection method in this study are literature study and documents study. The data analysis is qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that: first, legal consideration of committee that cancel the Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights No. M.HH- 01.AH.11.01 in 2015 on March 23, 2015 and the implement of Decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights No. M.HH-21.AH.11.01 in 2012 on September 04, 2012 is in order to avoid any lack of stewardship DPP Golkar Party as a result of the cancellation of the decree was delayed and disputed by the Court as well as to provide legal protection for the Golkar Party to participate in the elections simultaneously and second, the impact of law and legal force from the decision of Jakarta State Administrative Court No. 62/G/2015/PTUN-JKT are cancel and require the Minister of Law and Human Rights revoke the decree of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights No. M.HH-01.AH.11. 01 2015, The legal force from the decision is still valid, right and correct. The Cassation council agreed with the law consideration. Keywords: Decision, Advisory Council of Judges, The Impact of Law and the Legal Force.

Jenis Karya Akhir: Skripsi
Subyek: > KZ Law of Nations
Program Studi: Fakultas Hukum > Prodi Ilmu Hukum S1
Pengguna Deposit: 9033228 . Digilib
Date Deposited: 25 Feb 2016 08:18
Terakhir diubah: 25 Feb 2016 08:18
URI: http://digilib.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/21221

Actions (login required)

Lihat Karya Akhir Lihat Karya Akhir