Sari Astuti, 1542011030 (2019) PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN KEKERASAN (Studi putusan No. 22/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN Kot). FAKULTAS HUKUM, UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG.
|
File PDF
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (168Kb) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://digilib.unila.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
File PDF
SKRIPSI FULL.pdf Restricted to Hanya staf Download (2241Kb) |
|
|
File PDF
SKRIPSI TANPA BAB PEMBAHASAN.pdf Download (2015Kb) | Preview |
Abstrak (Berisi Bastraknya saja, Judul dan Nama Tidak Boleh di Masukan)
Law enforcement for children as perpetrators of crime of theft with violence in Indonesia is still weak. For example in the case of Noval aged 17 years with a decision of 1 month and 15 days, the judge should also consider the principle of justice for the community and victims. The problem in this study is how law enforcement for children as perpetrators of criminal acts of theft with violence No. 22 / Pid.Sus-Son / 2018 / PN Kot? and what is the basis for judges' consideration in alleviating the decisions of children as perpetrators of criminal acts of theft with the violence of Case No. 22 / Pid.Sus-Son / 2018 / PN Kot? This study uses a normative juridical approach and empirical jurisdiction. The type of data uses secondary and primary data. Data analysis using qualitative analysis. The research informants were the City Agung District Court Judge, Women's Empowerment Office and Tanggamus Child Protection and Lecturer in Criminal Law Section at the Law Faculty of the University of Lampung. Based on the results of the research and discussion, the Supreme Court District Judge in ruling has been in accordance with Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection and Law No.11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, and Article 71 Paragraph (1) awarding a decision for 1 month and 15 days in prison, but according to the author the judge should give criminal sanctions of more than 1 month 15 days, or at least the same as the prosecutor's demands, because the perpetrator is 17 years old at the age of the adult. The basis of the judge's consideration in alleviating the verdict is that the child is young so that he is expected to correct his mistakes, and the child is forthright in the trial so as to facilitate the trial. The suggestion in this study is that judges in law enforcement should not be fixated on rules normatively and can better understand the specific rules in the Child Criminal Justice System. So that in law enforcement must be able to truly provide protection to children as perpetrators as well as prioritizing justice for victims and the community Keywords: Law Enforcement, Child Actor, Violence theft.
| Jenis Karya Akhir: | Skripsi |
|---|---|
| Subyek: | 300 Ilmu sosial > 340 Ilmu hukum 300 Ilmu sosial > 340 Ilmu hukum > 341 Hukum-hukum negara |
| Program Studi: | Fakultas Hukum > Prodi Ilmu Hukum S1 |
| Pengguna Deposit: | UPT . Teti Novianti |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Apr 2022 03:16 |
| Terakhir diubah: | 20 Apr 2022 03:16 |
| URI: | http://digilib.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/58602 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Lihat Karya Akhir |
