0743022043, Risky Mayang Sari (2012) PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA SISWA ANTARA PEMBELAJARAN PENDEKATAN KETERAMPILAN PROSES DAN PENDEKATAN CTL (CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING). Digital Library.
|
File PDF
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (74Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
ABSTRACK.pdf Download (131Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
COVER DALAM.pdf Download (11Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
COVER LUAR.pdf Download (26Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
DAFTAR GAMBAR.pdf Download (6Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
DAFTAR ISI.pdf Download (168Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
DAFTAR TABEL.pdf Download (52Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
MOTTO.pdf Download (14Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
PENGESAHAN.pdf Download (5Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
PERNYATAAN.pdf Download (81Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
PERSEMBAHAN.pdf Download (18Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
PERSETUJUAN.pdf Download (7Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Download (5Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
SANWACANA.pdf Download (120Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
BAB I .pdf Download (89Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
BAB II .pdf Download (126Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
BAB III.pdf Download (362Kb) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://digilib.unila.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
File PDF
BAB IV .pdf Restricted to Hanya pengguna terdaftar Download (462Kb) |
|
|
File PDF
BAB V.pdf Download (8Kb) | Preview |
|
|
File PDF
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (157Kb) | Preview |
Abstrak (Berisi Bastraknya saja, Judul dan Nama Tidak Boleh di Masukan)
Hasil belajar fisika siswa SMA PGRI 1 Tumijajar masih sangat rendah dan belum memenuhi Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal (KKM). Sehingga pembelajaran pendekatan CTL dan pembelajaran pendekatan keterampilan proses mampu meningkatkan hasil belajar fisika siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan rata-rata hasil belajar fisika siswa sebelum dan sesudah menggunakan pendekatan CTL; (2) Perbedaan rata-rata hasil belajar fisika siswa sebelum dan sesudah menggunakan pendekatan keterampilan proses; (3) Perbedaan hasil belajar fisika siswa dengan menggunakan pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan keterampilan proses. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen dengan bentuk Quasi Eksperiment dengan tipe Pretest-Posttest Non Equivalent Control Group Design dan lokasi penelitian di SMA PGRI 1 Tumijajar. Sampel diambil dua kelas yaitu kelas X2 dan X3. Teknik analisis data hasil belajar menggunakan skor pretest dan posttest, skor N-gain dan pengujian hipotesis menggunakan uji Paired Sampel t-Test dan Independent Sample t-Test. Selanjutnya untuk menguji ada perbedaan antara variabel bebas dengan variabel terikat dengan menggunakan uji Paired Sampel t-Test dan Independent Sample t- Test. Hasil analisis data terdapat perbedaan antara: (1) hasil belajar fisika siswa sebelum dan sesudah pembelajaran dengan menggunakan pendekatan CTL yang ditunjukkan oleh nilai sig sebesar 0,000, (2) sedangkan dengan pendekatan keterampilan proses yang ditunjukkan oleh nilai sig sebesar 0,000, (3) hasil belajar fisika siswa dengan menggunakan pendekatan CTL dan keterampilan proses yang ditunjukkan oleh nilai sig sebesar 0,000. Karena nilai sig tersebut jauh dibawah α (0,05) maka, secara umum disimpulkan bahwa semua H0 ditolak. The result of physics learning students’ of SMA PGRI 1 Tumijajar was still very low and had not reached the Minimum Passing Grade (MPG). So the instructional of CTL approach and the instructional of skill process approach could increase the result of students’ physics learning. The aim of this research were to understand about: (1) the difference of average between students’ physics learning result before and after using CTL; (2) the difference of average between students’ physics learning result before and after using skill process approach; (3) the difference of average between students’ physics learning result by using CTL approach and skill process approach. This reaserch used experimental method that is Quasi Experiment by Pretest- Posttest Non Equivalent Control Group Design type and the location of the research was on SMA PGRI 1 Tumijajar. Sample was taken from two classes that were class X2 and class X3. Data analysis technique of learning result used pretest and posttest score, N-Gain score and testing hypothesis used Paired Sampel t-Test and Independent Sampel t-Test. Furthermore, to examine that there was difference between independent variable and dependent variable by using Paired Sample t-Test and Independent Sample t- Test.from the result of data analysis there was difference between: (1) the result of students’ physics learning before and after using the instructional of CTL approach that shown by 0,000 sig value, (2) the result of students’ physics learning before and after using the instructional skill process approach that shown by 0,000 sig value, (3) the result of students’ physics learning by using CTL approach and skill process approach that shown by 0,000 sig value. Because of the sig value was lower under α (0,05) so, generally, it can be concluded that all of H0 was rejected.
| Jenis Karya Akhir: | Artikel |
|---|---|
| Subyek: | |
| Program Studi: | FKIP > Prodi Pendidikan Fisika |
| Pengguna Deposit: | TIK . 6 |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Dec 2015 01:58 |
| Terakhir diubah: | 14 Dec 2015 01:58 |
| URI: | http://digilib.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/15550 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Lihat Karya Akhir |
